Search for: "Levy v. Levy" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:16 pm
467/08, Padawan v SGAE in which the ECJ – to the contrary –stipulates that right holders should be “adequately” compensated for the use made of their protected works. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:54 am
Those damages are levied as a form of punishment and deterrence against the offender. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 10:57 am
Added to the mix here were charges of the most serious sort (molestation of his own brother's children in their home where he was a guest) levied against an individual with a prior criminal history. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:34 pm
  The conversation ranges from Bush did it, to discussions of class and race, to self dependence v. government dependence, and to the differences between a levy burst and a river flood. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:52 pm by Joe Mullin
Created by Libby Levi, courtesy of opensourceway.com US law on software patents is as chaotic as it's ever been. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Lawsuit by pilot against landowner who shot down his drone is dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction [Cyrus Farivar, ArsTechnica; earlier here and (criminal case) here] Super-broad readings of Emoluments Clause intended to trip up President Trump might have unwelcome consequences for over 2 million military retirees and 2.8 million federal employees also affected by the Clause’s interpretation [Chuck Blanchard via Andy Grewal; earlier on Emoluments Clause] “Appeals court throws… [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:16 pm
Today, the Wall Street Journal has this editorial on the bill that amends the law at issue in the Davenport v. [read post]