Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 46,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2011, 10:37 am
In the case McGOVERN v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 8:27 am
UM - SOUTH CAROLINA POLICY - POLICY RENEWAL OFFER - SELF-TERMINATING STATE - STAY OF ARBITRATIONMatter of Esurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
It's . . . not good.When an attorney's brief is so bad that the appeal gets dismissed, and the client thereby injured, my take is that the attorney should generally be sanctioned and/or reported to the State Bar.Yet the panel here apparently does neither.This is not an attorney who's just started practicing law. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
Recently, in Carlebach v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:54 am
In Allure Pet Products, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:54 am
In Allure Pet Products, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:54 am
In Allure Pet Products, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:32 am
–State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 4:11 pm
Specifically, the questions presented are: Whether the “substantial[ity]” and “federal-state balance” requirements of Grable are satisfied whenever a federal law standard is referenced to inform the standard of care in a state-law cause of action, so long as the parties dispute whether federal law embodies the asserted standard. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:11 pm
The opinion is long, comprehensive, and articulate. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
[State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:59 pm
Hafer v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:45 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to render an opinion in Hadden v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
EvidenceProf focused on a different portion of the opinion:The Seventh Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm
(AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) If, as seems likely, the Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
