Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 7:01 pm
And that, San Francisco pedestrian accident attorney Gregory J. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
J. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
The threshold for issuing a form W-2 is based on dollars – nothing else matters. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm
The NLRB will also revisit its so-called “quickie election” rules in 2014 with a full quorum, according to Bourgeacq, and will probably adopt a more onerous rule, making it easier for unions to organize and win elections. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
Even if it doesn’t merit federal deference, it represents a valid rule of California constitutional law, which California courts would explicitly adopt as a matter of state law if pressed. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
First, the non-paternity rule, adopted as part of a comprehensive parentage act in 1994 and based on a model act adopted by many other states, imposed clear requirements. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Adoption, as a formal matter, did not exist in the U.S. until the middle of the Nineteenth Century. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
See for example, “The Federal Business Record Provision: Section 30 of the Canada Evidence Act,” at p. 82, and generally, pp. 44-119 in, J. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
It Matters for Trademark Registration Purposes http://t.co/dViwRSSWuO -> The Google Book project: is it fair use? [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
Thus, the court remanded the penalty matter to the commissioner for further consideration. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
It stems from a tension that I perceive between the American Cyanamid approach as applied by the Court of Appeal in the Bath case, and the approach suggested by Tomlinson J in Vertex and adopted by Akenhead J in Ericsson. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:16 am
J. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
R. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
A valid payment was effected on 14 March 2011 only, i.e. within the six-month time-limit provided for in R 51(3). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
(f/k/a Plimus).David J. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
It is a matter of fact and degree. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 8:11 am
Rubin & Peter Shedd, Human Capital and Covenants Not to Compete, 10 J. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
Clarke Michael J. [read post]
