Search for: "MATTER OF V R B" Results 1001 - 1020 of 8,794
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It is true that the UK court was only continuing to dig a furrow already largely opened by the Court of Justice in Huawei v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Thus, this decision is in no way a matter of a debit order submitted without comment, which the Board of Appeal considered an implicit request for correction. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:07 pm by Joy Waltemath
The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment (Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms B and her three daughters had been given temporary accommodation as homeless by LB Hammersmith and Fulham in 2015, in a hotel/B&B. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The second judgment to be handed down is R (on the application of Gourlay) (AP) v Parole Board. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:16 am by JR Chaves
Para ello hay diferentes formas de conseguirlo: una vía digamos normal y otra vía exprés. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 1:04 pm by Giles Peaker
As per Lord Reid in London Corporation v Cusack-Smith [1955] AC 337: “A, the freeholder, may let to B for a rent of £100 which is a rack-rent at the date of B’s lease, and later B may sublet to C for a rent of £200 which is a rack-rent at the date of C’s lease. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Dennis Crouch
Teller, 53 P.3d 240, 249 (Haw. 2002). = = = = L·U·B·R·I·C·I·O·U·S [T]he patent fails to teach how the invention actually achieves lubriciousness. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:18 am by Dennis Crouch
(Granting renewed motion for JMOL under R.50(b).) [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter &… [read post]