Search for: "MLB" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2011, 11:17 am by A. Lahser, Trademark Attorney
Can I trademark a symbol that is similar to the red, white and blue MLB and NBA logos? [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:31 pm by Eryn Doherty
  Under the terms of the loan MLB cannot seize the team if it defaults on the loan, however, MLB did not waive any claims for past or future violations of MLB rules and regulations that the Dodgers might have, including filing for bankruptcy protection. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:14 am by admin
  In the first instance, putting aside the obvious fact that such a lawsuit [By McCourt against MLB – Ed.] would violate both the Major League Constitution [Article VI, Sec. 2, "the Clubs agree to be finally and unappealably bound by actions of the Commissioner …" – Ed.] and the contractual commitments that both you and the Club (and all other Major League Clubs) have made, these threats clearly do not put things on a “constructive path”. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:57 pm by David
It seems more likely that MLB wants to keep a clean image and AROD is not helping. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:36 am by admin
  [You'd think that this, unless approved by the Commissioner, would violate the MLB Constitution. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:00 am by lawshucks
Clients aren't complaining about lockstep. ...BREAKING NEWS: MLB Cancels 2010 Summer Program and Eliminates LockstepThis just in: Morgan Lewis has canceled its summer program for 2010 and has eliminated lockstep. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 7:27 am by admin
  For what happened next, I cannot improve on the words of Baseball’s MLB’s bankruptcy court response to Mr. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:11 am by Nathaniel Grow
Perhaps most notably, every single round of league expansion in MLB history has been directly preceded by a Congressional threat to revoke the sport’s antitrust exemption. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:19 am by Bankruptcy Prof
"The Dodgers and Major League Baseball submitted a $150-million loan agreement to the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:29 am by Josh Sturtevant
According to the ESPN piece, one MLB executive was quoted as saying, 'You get the feeling that Alex says what he thinks he needs to say to get by, and then goes out and does what he wants.' That does not seem to be the kind of behavior Bud Selig would take too kindly to. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:24 am by Neil Schoenblum
UPDATE: Houston Astros owner Drayton McLane announced that he has reached a definitive agreement to sell the team to a group led by Jim Crane for $680 million, which would be the second-highest price in major league history if approved by MLB. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:31 am by Bankruptcy Legal Group
Judge Gross found that MLB's plan demonstrated a "substantial economic superiority" to the loan suggested by McCourt. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
MLB wanted players to keep pine tar off the hitting area of the bat because if pine tar got on the ball, the ball would have to be thrown out, requiring teams to provide more balls each game. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:03 am by Tomassi Law Associates
The court would have to approve an auction, which would be opposed by MLB and Fox. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by Howard Wasserman
MLB wanted players to keep pine tar off the hitting area of the bat because if pine tar got on the ball, the ball would have to be thrown out, requiring teams to provide more balls each game. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:29 pm by Bankruptcy Prof
Judge Gross rejected the Dodgers' request to get its financing from Highbridge Corp, saying that “a comparison of the Highbridge loan and the proposed MLB loan clearly shows the substantial economic superiority of the MLB loan. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:15 pm by Nathan Koppel
Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross sided with the league, ordering the Dodgers to negotiate with MLB about its loan offer. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Howard Wasserman
MLB's argument during the Flood trial was that this was not an antitrust matter, but a matter for collective bargaining. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:13 am by Howard Wasserman
MLB's argument during the Flood trial was that this was not an antitrust matter, but a matter for collective bargaining. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:19 pm by Colin O'Keefe
[MSG] stopped doing the show and there was a lot of changeover there and a lot of the guys from [MSG] went to MLB Network. [read post]