Search for: "Makely v. United States Air Force"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
That intense experience in representing the United States in briefing and arguing cases before the Court over most of two Terms cannot be duplicated in any other capacity. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm
(2) AIR CARRIER- The term `air carrier’ has the meaning given that term in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
They move "right" when the government lets businesses make decisions for "commercial reasons" rather than trying to encourage them to meet political goals. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:38 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is Grosz v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Defendant Tommie Huff was convicted of bribery and conspiracy to commit wire fraud for his role in a kickback scheme that involved placing fraudulent orders for Robbins Air Force Base. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Defendant Tommie Huff was convicted of bribery and conspiracy to commit wire fraud for his role in a kickback scheme that involved placing fraudulent orders for Robbins Air Force Base. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
This Second Circuit appeal concerns the dismissal of Grosz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:01 am
According to Tribunal V, the difference between an aggressive war and an invasion was that the latter did not involve armed resistance: [A]n invasion of one state by another is the implementation of the national policy of the invading state by force even though the invaded state, due to fear or a sense of the futility of resistance in the face of superior force, adopts a policy of nonresistance and thus prevents the occurrence of any actual… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:06 am
See also International Judicial Monitor for United States: Guevera v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
In the United States, these minorities tend to be black. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:05 pm
The legislative activity stems from the Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
Ms Kaschke has a torrent of posts on the case, the most recent of which is entitled “Victims of Terror Unite” which calls on victims of terror to unite “against this very liberal ruling of Mr Justice Eady“. [read post]
