Search for: "Mark A. Lemley" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 7:30 am by Jason Rantanen
For instance, as one of us showed in a prior study with Mark Lemley, the Federal Circuit upholds the validity of a patent over a challenge on patentable subject matter grounds about 20% of the time when it decides the case in a precedential opinion. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:23 am by Dennis Crouch
See also, Mark Lemley, The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights, 61 Stan. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:01 am by Eric Goldman
Lantagne, The University of Mississippi School of Law Jyh-An Lee, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Mark A. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 10:06 pm by Luciana Herman
Professor Mark Lemley (Stanford ’88) and Lecturer Shawn Miller have tasked their students with coding a database that tracks patent “trolls,” or false litigants who file spurious patent cases. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:12 pm
In closing, let me recommend Mark Lemley's excellent paper on the economics of free riding as it applies to patent and copyright debates. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 7:24 am by Eric M. Fraser
But the doctrine has faced recent criticism, most notably in Mark Lemley’s 2016 article, “Rethinking Assignor Estoppel. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am by Daniel J. Gilman
For an academic pro-regulatory perspective, there were comments submitted by professors Mark Lemley and Orly Lobel. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:14 am
Mark Lemley: The optimal economic result may well be some, but not much, infringement. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:22 pm
One finds a perfect storm in Obama's advocacy of Lemley's theories on patent law reform, nowrejected by enough senators that S.1145 won't even get a vote. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:59 pm by David Post
It’s quite gratifying, and something of a turning point, I think, in terms of the politics of the Net, and it’s gratifying to have played a small part to help generate the current outcry about these truly egregious bills (Mark Lemley, Dave Levine, and I having written a Law Professors’ Letter in opposition that generated over 100 signatures — and, according to the counter at Scribd.com, has been downloaded over 50,000 times already . . . ) I’m pretty… [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Felten, Princeton University; Jennifer Jenkins, Duke Law School; Mark A. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Census); Scott Kominers (Harvard Fellow); Amy Landers (Drexel); Mark Lemley (Stanford); David Levine (Wash U Econ); Yvette Liebesman (SLU); Brian Love (SCU); Phil Malone (Stanford); Michael Meurer (BU); Joseph Miller (Georgia); Ira Nathenson (St. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Mark Lemley filed a brief on behalf of Powell Books, et al. that runs in parallel with a brief filed by a group of art museums. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 12:57 am
"****Separately, Mark Lemley wrote of Carlson in Patenting Nanotechnology:Chester Carlson, a patent attorney, invented xerography in 1938. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
Topics include:      Quality and Pendency: Drilling Down to Backlog, Deferred Examination, Patent Worksharing and Other Integers to Achieve Primary Goals led by Hal Wegner The Role of Applicant Incentives in Patent Office Reform led by Dennis Crouch Patent Examination Policy and the Social Costs of Examiner Allowance and Rejection Errors led by Ron Katznelson Examiner Characteristics and the Patent Grant Rate led by Mark Lemley & Bhaven Sampat … [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm by Dennis Crouch
Mark Lemley suggests this narrowing-the-claim a “promise is likely illusory in modern patent jurisprudence, which has all but eliminated the ability to argue that claims should be narrowed to avoid invalidating prior art. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Failing this, the court suggested (citing Mark Lemley's Divided Infringement article) that patentees may be able to correct a claim by seeking a reissue patent. [read post]