Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 70,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2008, 4:55 am
Mark was a leader in the field of intellectual property law, specializing in jury trials of technologically complex cases for both plaintiffs and defendants across the country. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm
The Marks decision was the most divided case from the Texas Supreme Court’s 2009 Term — after being the most divided case from its 2008 Term. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:32 pm
The Sixth Circuit concluded that Creative Harbor did not have a firm intention to use the mark with all the goods and services, but instead was reserving a right in the mark in case it ever wanted to expand its commercial line of goods. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 3:02 pm
However, the Board pointed out that this line of cases was inapplicable to the case at bar. [read post]
18 May 2020, 8:25 am
The treatment of such a single dual-marked ballot can have dramatic consequences in a close election, as was the case in Providence Health & Services. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
In attendance were Mark Gruber, Peter Cannon and DaphneGaylord, Capital Collateral Re~ional Counsel for the Defendant, Ken Nunnelley andBarbara Davis, Office ofthe Attorney General and Wayne Holmes, Office of the StateAttorney. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 10:09 am
Today on Lawfare No Bull: On the evening of December 13th, the House Committee investigating the January 6th Capitol riot unanimously passed a motion to hold former Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in criminal contempt of Congress. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:46 am
., patent lawyer Matthew Pequignot did some investigating after spotting patent markings on the lid to his daily cup of coffee and discovered that the patent had actually expired some 20 years before.Now the lawyer is seeking millions of dollars in damages in a qui tam suit against the lid maker, Solo Cup, that won a favorable ruling in March, the Associated Press reports.The case is in ED Va before U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:53 pm
., October 22, 2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of United: Herrera could show no pretext in his termination, and United's reasons were legitimate and nondiscriminatory)*Cases marked with an asterisk are 10th Circuit cases the court declared not to be binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 8:56 pm
., September 13, 2018) (affirming dismissal of Keller's pro se social-security-benefits complaint for failure of the short-and-plain-statement requirement)*Cases marked with an asterisk are 10th Circuit cases the court declared not to be binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:45 pm
., July 17, 2018) (affirming dismissal of complaint as frivolous) *Cases marked with an asterisk are 10th Circuit cases the court declared not to be binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The registration of the mark was therefore refused.The case illustrates the difficulty in registering satirical or parody marks, especially when they relate to big, well-known brands. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
The case goes to show that one has to be careful if using a registered trade mark as a whole in a new mark, even if one would imagine they are very different from each other. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:12 am
The case indicates that on both trade mark law and article 14, the issues will be referred to the ECJ for a clearer ruling.The judgment is available here. [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:38 pm
Lawyers on the Advisory Board for the "Patent Case Management Judicial Guide":-- Kenneth R. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:30 pm
Another case is the repeat filings of a trade mark, that are not prohibited per se, except when they are carried out only to avoid the consequences entailed by non-use of earlier trade marks. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:40 am
This Kat has been alerted to AG's opinion in a case referred to CJEU by the Austrian Patent and Trade Mark Office Appeal Board, Case C-409-12, Backaldrin Osterreich The Kornspitz Company. [read post]
31 May 2018, 1:35 pm
As in all trademark opposition cases involving likelihood of confusion, Opposer bore the burden of proof. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 1:19 pm
That was the case here as the SEC made clear in its press release announcing the award. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 1:36 pm
In the meantime, please mark your calendar and watch this space for more information. [read post]
