Search for: "Mark Lemley"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
[Mark A. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am
For an academic pro-regulatory perspective, there were comments submitted by professors Mark Lemley and Orly Lobel. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:42 am
Mention of Mark Lemley’s work that examiners don’t rely on the disclosures but on their own searches; we may have overdisclosure now. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
Failing this, the court suggested (citing Mark Lemley's Divided Infringement article) that patentees may be able to correct a claim by seeking a reissue patent. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Felten, Princeton University; Jennifer Jenkins, Duke Law School; Mark A. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:14 am
Mark Lemley: The optimal economic result may well be some, but not much, infringement. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 7:24 am
But the doctrine has faced recent criticism, most notably in Mark Lemley’s 2016 article, “Rethinking Assignor Estoppel. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Mark Lemley suggests this narrowing-the-claim a “promise is likely illusory in modern patent jurisprudence, which has all but eliminated the ability to argue that claims should be narrowed to avoid invalidating prior art. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:36 am
A strong academic amicus brief from Mark Lemley argued that the structure of the section required a high intent standard for Section 271(b). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
(Mark Lemley). [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
Guest speakers include, Judge O'Malley, Mark Lemley, David Kappos, and a number of other influential individuals in the IP field. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 7:30 am
For instance, as one of us showed in a prior study with Mark Lemley, the Federal Circuit upholds the validity of a patent over a challenge on patentable subject matter grounds about 20% of the time when it decides the case in a precedential opinion. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:48 pm
Topics include: Quality and Pendency: Drilling Down to Backlog, Deferred Examination, Patent Worksharing and Other Integers to Achieve Primary Goals led by Hal Wegner The Role of Applicant Incentives in Patent Office Reform led by Dennis Crouch Patent Examination Policy and the Social Costs of Examiner Allowance and Rejection Errors led by Ron Katznelson Examiner Characteristics and the Patent Grant Rate led by Mark Lemley & Bhaven Sampat … [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 10:06 pm
Professor Mark Lemley (Stanford ’88) and Lecturer Shawn Miller have tasked their students with coding a database that tracks patent “trolls,” or false litigants who file spurious patent cases. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:35 am
Mark Lemley filed a brief on behalf of Powell Books, et al. that runs in parallel with a brief filed by a group of art museums. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:58 am
Rev. 317 (2005), sólo páginas 325-326; 342-357 (download) Brett Frischmann & Mark Lemley, Spillovers, 107 Colum L Rev 257 (2007) solo páginas 257-284 (download) Tercera sesión: Jueves, 14 de abril de 2016 Los derechos de autor y la libertad de expresión Finalmente, consideraremos el rol de la libertad de expresión en la configuración de ideales que dan vida a los derechos de autor. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:23 am
See also, Mark Lemley, The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights, 61 Stan. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 10:30 am
Mark Lemley, Stanford Law School Prof. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:22 pm
One finds a perfect storm in Obama's advocacy of Lemley's theories on patent law reform, nowrejected by enough senators that S.1145 won't even get a vote. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
Given the Court’s recent attention in patent cases to academic writings, the most important brief probably is the brief that Mark Lemley files on behalf of more than forty professors. [read post]
