Search for: "Marks v. Howe" Results 1001 - 1020 of 14,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
While still pending federal approval, the deal marks a breakthrough in fraught negotiations for water in the drought-stricken region. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:05 am
See if you can guess how they came out just based on looking at the marks and the involved goods and services. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:53 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
While Swales left some important questions open—e.g., how high is the bar that a plaintiff must clear—it marked a victory for employers. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
S. 183, 187 (2006) (per curiam) (remanding to agency based on failure by Court of Appeals to "appl[y] the ordinary remand rule" (internal quotation marks omitted)); INS v. [read post]
  The panelists also indicated that FINRA is using CAT data to surveil cross-market and cross-product (i.e., options impacted by swap trading), fractional share order marking (i.e., held v. not held), and firms’ pricing of fractional share fills based on a review of representative orders. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:21 am
Anyway, let's see how you do with the three oppositions summarized below. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
Since July 2021, when Tunisia’s democratically-elected president unilaterally launched a series of measures to consolidate power in his own hands, U.S. and Western policymakers have grown increasingly perplexed about how to restore democracy in that country. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Even where it is clear that the nominee is completely independent from the nominating stockholder, the nominating stockholder presumably has a compelling reason for engaging in a proxy fight, so the voting stockholders will need answers to an additional level of questions to better understand the interests, agenda, plans and proposals of the nominating stockholder, and how the nominee is expected to further that agenda. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:37 pm by Chris Koszo
According the the California Supreme Court, “Actionable negligence consists of two elements: (1) duty; and (2) breach of that duty by failure to exercise reasonable care” (Roemer v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:37 pm by Chris Koszo
According the the California Supreme Court, “Actionable negligence consists of two elements: (1) duty; and (2) breach of that duty by failure to exercise reasonable care” (Roemer v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
A welcome move away from the reasoning in Stocker v Stocker, in which the High Court and Court of Appeal held (before being overturned by the Supreme Court) that a woman had defamed her ex-husband in saying he tried to strangle her when it “was beyond dispute” that he had grasped her by the throat so tightly as to leave red marks on her neck visible to police officers two hours later. [read post]