Search for: "Matter of Bright"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 5,381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2020, 2:22 pm
In Alberta, for example, the Court of Queen’s Bench has taken the initiative to allow, “with the approval of the Law Society of Alberta”, remote commissioning in civil and family matters, subject to detailed instructions. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:13 am
Even if that line is a bright line, it can still move this way or that. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 10:06 am
As you are aware, things are changing quickly and there is no clear-cut authority or bright line rules. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:48 am
The bright lines that would be established by focusing on an employee’s designated title and training would benefit both the employee and the institution: They would put the employee on notice that secular employment discrimination laws may not apply to her, while at the same time sending a “clear and powerful message that the church has put its faith in” that employee’s hands. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm
Frank Pallone’s letter to HHS Inspector General calling for investigation of Bright matter, 4/23/20 “House to examine ouster of health official who doubted drugs Trump pushed,” New York Times, 4/23/20 “Ousting vaccine chief is going to ‘set us back,’ former FDA head says,” Politico, 4/26/20 “Vaccine expert from HHS to file whistleblower complaint,” CBS News, 4/24/20 SUING CHINA Missouri AG’s complaint filed in… [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:42 am
In the personal injury matter of Pareja v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:42 am
In the personal injury matter of Pareja v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
” But the test (see paras 125-134) should properly be the “manifestly without reasonable foundation” test, which was not restricted to welfare benefit cases: For those reasons, if I were required to determine the matter, I would say that the manifestly without reasonable foundation criterion applies to the issue of justification in this case. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
To complicate matters for some applicants, there are additional business affiliation rules, including assessment of control and ownership by related businesses. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
There’s simply no way to get consistency out of fair use without bright-line rules. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
The national fight against the spread of the novel coronavirus demands a leader who can take charge of and defeat a grave threat, and who can put partisan politics aside to create a shared sense of national purpose. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am
For that purpose, where the ALPRs are placed matters too. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:55 am
Unfortunately, there is no bright-line rule and the answer may differ under federal law and California law, or other states. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
Impact from the perspective of employers’ liability Insurers This matter provides some useful guidance on the issue of vicarious liability. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 5:53 am
However, this is not a challenge to see how bright a light you can get. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
A basic matter is ensuring there is, in fact, public access. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 11:04 am
Although, as I discuss later, the two rights provisions at issue include other limiting principles, there is no textual basis for the bright-line, post-indictment only restriction the Majority adds to the statute. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Democrats Have Found a Coronavirus Bright Spot. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:38 pm
Section 211 of the Delaware General Corporation Law allows a board, if authorized by a corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws, to determine the place of a meeting of shareholders, including whether the meeting may be held by “remote communication,” subject to three conditions: the corporation must verify that each person deemed present and permitted to vote at the meeting is a stockholder or proxyholder; the corporation must implement reasonable measures to provide… [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
Conclusion and Implications While the Court of Appeal’s opinion correctly follows settled law, it is nonetheless important both as a reminder of the operation of CEQA’s “bright line” statute of limitations rules, and to clarify the very limited situations in which an NOD or NOE will be deemed “facially invalid” such that its filing will not trigger CEQA’s short statute of limitations periods. [read post]
