Search for: "Matter of Dunn"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
So if the people of Arizona can be considered a legislature for Article I, section 4 purposes, then it matters not whether the IRC is a legislature. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
: Urooj Ahmad v Maya Appliances (IP Frontline) Ireland Commercial Court makes first Community designs ruling: Karen Millen Ltd v Dunnes Stores (International Law Office) Israel Boy from package of Israeli chocolate drink sues Elite for 5 million NIS (The IP Factor) Kenya Court of Appeal declines to set aside High Court order restraining Delta Connections from using DELTA (Afro-IP) South Africa South African Revenue Services loses two recent cases… [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
But what the FDA can demand as a regulatory matter simply ain’t what the common-law requires. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
Attorney Jim Greenlee [originally I said Dunn Lampton, who is the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
There, the solicitor general recommends the court dismiss the bill of complaint and not let the matter proceed. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Comment: While the new rule makes good sense as a matter of jurisprudential policy, it also happens to cut both ways (shortening or lengthening the limitations period depending on the nature of the claim and under what theory it is actionable). [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
No matter what the number of the Trust, it makes no difference in litigation, except that the pleadings are different between the three law firms that have been prosecuting these cases in Texas: Regent and Associates (older cases), Michael J. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
United States – holding that where a juror has communicated with a third party “about the matter pending before the jury,” an evidentiary hearing must be held to determine the prejudicial impact of the communication – was an unreasonable application of the Supreme Court’s clearly established law. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
Dunn and Dr. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 10:01 am
Elaine Kamarck, Brookings senior fellow, will moderate a discussion with Lisa Brown, co-director of agency review for the Obama-Biden Transition Project, John Hudak, Brookings senior fellow and Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, Brookings nonresident senior fellow. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In my last column, I explored some aspects of an important case, Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In our democracy, more speech is to be favored over less speech (especially as to controversial matters of public policy), and the proper answer to unwise or hurtful speech is better, counter speech, not silencing (or allowing someone else to silence) the original speaker.As against these concerns of government manipulation/distortion and conferral of a Heckler’s veto, of course, the important government objectives of fiscal integrity and the avoidance of violence must be weighed.The… [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
From that point on, the movie raced to an expedited hearing before the United States Supreme Court on these matters, followed shortly by the dramatic announcement in 1971 that the Court decided, 6–3, to rule in favor of the Times and the Post.The Post is a fine movie. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The Special Case of Numerical Minorities, and Minorities Without a Natural Majority Counterpart There are forceful responses to this suggestion, however, that may support Justice Reinhardt even though he doesn’t really address this issue (or the nitty gritty of applying heightened scrutiny at all, for that matter.) [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
In 1993, Congress enacted the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), essentially to reinstate, as a matter of federal statute, the strict scrutiny religious liberty rights regime that individuals and institutions had previously understood to emanate from the Constitution itself. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 11:57 pm
House of Representatives Captain Carneysha Mendoza (Testimony) Field Commander Special Operations Division United States Capitol Police (USCP) House Energy & Commerce Committee (February 24, 2021) House Energy &… [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
