Search for: "Matter of Forde v Forde" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 3:47 am by David Smith
We understand that there is a permission to appeal request pending in the Court of Appeal but that this has been stayed until after the decision in the conjoined matters of Universal Estates v Tiensia and Honeysuckle Properties v Fletcher. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 pm by Erin Miller
To his credit, President Gerald Ford five years later also looked past many individuals who were mentioned or actively lobbying to succeed Justice William O. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am by Erin Miller
  The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:31 am by Jon L. Gelman
A major step towards liberalizing the Workers' Compensation Act relating to cardiovascular claims occurred in 1962 in the matter of Dwyer v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Jim Gerl
He joined the High Court in December 1975, having been appointed by President Gerald Ford. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
"He is a Gerald Ford Republican and is at the very left of this Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 10:26 am by Matt Osenga
  Justice Stevens, who turns 90 on April 20, was appointed to the Court by President Gerald Ford in 1975. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:38 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In the past the Court of Appeals has held "a party's failure to specify the basis for a general objection renders the argument unpreserved for [that] Court's review (see, People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886; People v Tevaha, 84 NY2d 879; People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 776). [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm by Brian Shiffrin
This, of course, is a very different holding and standard than the New York Court of Appeals had set forth in People v Ford (86 NY2d 397) in which the Court held that while it is ineffective assistance to affirmatively give bad advice on the immigration consequences, attorneys need not say anything. [read post]