Search for: "Matter of Morrison"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,435
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 1:37 pm
“I have no problem putting our redevelopment agency up against anyone,” Morrison said. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:04 am
As this alert from our friends at Morrison & Foerster discusses in detail, the fact that the Court refused to find as a matter of law that a reverse triangular merger generally is not an assignment and thus does not violate an anti-assignment clause is cause for concern. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:09 am
Inc., Morrison & Foerster LLP, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Winston & Strawn LLP — that have instituted a grossing up policy. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:57 am
This is not, of course, the approach of Lopez and Morrison (if it were, the cases would have come out differently). [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In addition, the whistleblower is considered to have brought the matter to the SEC when he or she brings it to the company for timing purposes. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:44 am
Rees Morrison, who blogs at Law Department Management, just wrote a really interesting post, Sorry, it’s perfectly fine if a firm sets a fee based on estimated hours of work. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:26 am
For that matter, do more recent cases call for considering the addition of older cases not considered part of the canon? [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:17 am
Before answering, consider Rees Morrison’s post, also on Sunday. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:07 am
Morrison (Columbia University - Law School) has posted Book Review: Constitutional Alarmism (Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (2010)) (Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:05 am
Understanding Matrixx Initiatives In this podcast, my colleagues Erik Olson and Stephen Thau of Morrison & Foerster talk about the recent Supreme Court case, Matrixx Initiatives v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am
No one, no matter how altruistic, would risk such a loss over a modest claim. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Given that the House of Representatives is now controlled by Republicans it will be interesting to see how the matter plays out. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:09 am
This organization “is composed of judges, attorneys, and a few non-attorney subject matter experts who are often called in to serve as special masters” in cases that have significant e-discovery issues. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The book is subtitled Tools and Templates to Increase Efficiency, and is organized around eight key issues: setting objectives and defining the scope of a matter, identifying and scheduling activities, assigning tasks and managing a legal team, planning and managing a budget, assessing risks to the schedule and budget, managing quality, managing client communication and expectations, and negotiating change orders. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:57 am
Morrison of the Columbia University School of Law. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
I just received a great memo from our friends at Morrison & Foerster on the new UK Bribery Act guidance released last week by the Ministry of Justice and I wanted to pass it on asap since the law comes into effect on July 1st. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:31 am
Morrison, Partner at Morrison & Nicholson. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
The Court did something similar last term in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm
She’s now a partner at Morrison & Foerster, which she joined in October 2010.Why did she leave Ropes? [read post]
