Search for: "Miller, v. United States"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
For example, in the seminal case of United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:56 pm
Miller, No. 08-0580/AR (granted 9 Oct); United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm
To file papers with the state. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:26 am
United Guar. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:23 pm
United Guar. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 7:34 am
Brief Introduction: On July 1, 2024, the Western District of Louisiana ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in the case, State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
Souter (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States sat by designation.Decision below.TMTV Corp v Mass Productions (1st Cir. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 11:57 am
United States, No. 09-172L (Fed. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I provide a brief summary of the United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:32 am
’ United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
SEE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
On appeal Miller argues that the state appellate court unreasonably concluded that McShane's performance at sentencing was not deficient or prejudicial, and he further contends that United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
Miller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:31 am
In Miller v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
Indeed, Harry Crouch, president of the NCFM, announced that the organization was “exploring its options, including filing a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:53 pm
Citation: U.S. v. [read post]
