Search for: "Morgan v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2008, 12:43 pm
From an August 2003 article in The Recorder via BrobeckInfo :Former Brobeck employees filed suit against both Brobeck and Morgan, Lewis seeking 60 days' severance pay, claiming the firms violated the state Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification and the California labor code by failing to provide employees 60 days' notice that the firm was to close or a mass layoff was to occur -- or 60 days' severance pay in lieu of notice.Oakland federal court Judge Claudia… [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 5:04 pm
Here is the abstract: In the 1954 case of United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
JP Morgan, No. 16-359 (appeal from 5th Circuit) (Whether a most-favored licensee (“MFL”) clauses in an intellectual property license agreement applies retrospectively to require refund if better terms are later given to another licensee?) [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Morgan Wade, No. 101.548 (Chautauqua)Direct appeal; First degree murderMatthew J. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Morgan Buying Keyword Ads on People’s Names Doesn’t Violate Their Publicity Rights–Habush v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
 On 27 April 2016, there will be an application in the case of ZAM v TFW & ors Judgments The following reserved judgments in media law cases are outstanding: CG v Facebook Ireland Limited, heard 4 and 5 April 2016 (Morgan LCJ, Gillen and Weatherup LJJ)(Northern Ireland Court of Appeal) Undre & anr v The London Borough of Harrow, heard 18 and 19 April 2016 (Warby J) PJS v News Group Newspapers, heard 21 April 2016 (UK Supreme Court) [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:03 am
Potter, 06-1321 — federal employee protection against retaliation for complaining about age bias in the workplace Morgan-Stanley Capital Group v. [read post]