Search for: "National Service Industries v. Powers" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Some say they are doing it out of a desire to be in public service or because they have a longtime loyalty to their congressional bosses. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 11:21 am
Government Intervention The auto industry is a private industry and is thus driven by market forces. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:27 am by CFM Admin
We have also highlighted some recent industry updates that we believe may impact our clients. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:27 am by CFM Admin
We have also highlighted some recent industry updates that we believe may impact our clients. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:25 pm by Josh Blackman
The purpose of the penalty, as the government explained to the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Media Cases from Other Jurisdictions The most important decision of the week is that of the Canadian Supreme Court in R v National Post 2010 SCC 16. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm by John Chierichella and Keith Szeliga
  First, to the extent the target has classified contracts and operates under a Facility Security Clearance (“FCL”), the parties must understand the limitations imposed by the Department of Defense National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (“NISPOM”), DoD 5220.22-M. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm by John Chierichella
  First, to the extent the target has classified contracts and operates under a Facility Security Clearance (“FCL”), the parties must understand the limitations imposed by the Department of Defense National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (“NISPOM”), DoD 5220.22-M. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP)   New Zealand Haka war dance now covered by intellectual property (Techdirt)   Nigeria Nigerian musicians want payment for music played on airplanes (Afro-IP)   Poland PARIS-DAKAR seeks to invalidate world trade mark registration for DAKAR by Polish company by the same name (Class 46)   South Africa Delays at the SA registry favour trade mark proprietor: Golden Fried Chicken (Pty) Ltd v Soulsa CC (Afro-IP)   Spain Exhaustion of trade… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm by lawmrh
So to its inestimable credit, the Texas Appeals Court made national news by distinguishing prior longstanding Texas case authority, Heiligmann v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Conference of Mayors are moving back to bipartisanship just as state and city leaders have been entrusted with more power than they have had in the nation’s history. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 2:40 am by Sherica Celine
Labor-Management Relations Corner Collective Bargaining Negotiations under the National Labor Relations Act: Key Considerations and Best Tracking Practices for Employers. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:01 am by Andres
The CJEU has had to analyse blocking orders in the case of UPC Telekabel v Constantin Film & Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft  (C‑314/12). [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Ben
 In their complaint, the major labels allege RCN Telecom has been aware for years of rampant copyright infringement by its subscribers, thousands of whom they assert include repeat offenders (UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am by Michelle Buhalo
Other publishers, including Bloomberg BNA, Thomson Reuters (West), and Wolters Kluwer, issued new editions of some of their titles: Nonprofit Organizations: Law and Taxation, Patent Prosecution: Law, Practice, and Procedure, and Sweet on Construction Industry Contracts: Major AIA Documents.Jenkins also continued to grow our print collection with new titles from the American Bar Association, the National Business Institute, the Pennsylvania Bar Institute, and the Practising Law… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
The waiver was challenged by 17 states and fuel industry trade groups, claiming it was unconstitutional because it granted California powers that other states did not enjoy. [read post]