Search for: "P. v. Smith"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
See also The Federalist No. 51, p. 324 (C. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
P. 166a(c); Little v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:10 am
Smith, 194 P.3d 399, 401, 2008 Ariz. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
In Erica P. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:16 am
" See McDill v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:44 am
., Inc. v Grimaldi 2024 NY Slip Op 32966(U) August 23, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157238/2021 Judge: Judy H. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:45 pm
Brake & Ors v The Chedington Court Estate Ltd (2022) EWCA Civ 1302 The Brake v Axnoller litigation reaches the Court of Appeal again, this time on the unlawful eviction claim concerning the cottage, which the Brakes had lost at first instance. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for… [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:37 pm
I’m not impressed, and neither were the two dissenting justices: Ciparick and Smith. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Moroney v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Smith, 131 P.2d 36 (Cal. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
By Joy P. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
Glover, 422 P.3d 64 (Kan. 2018). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:40 am
As I explained in this Michigan Law Review piece on the case, the statement both defies common sense and is in direct tension with the Court’s holding in Caperton v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:10 pm
Think of the elderly, as Scalia did in his surely-by-now-regretted dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Agency, Inc., 584 S.W.2d 860, 862 (Tex. 1979); Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 482 F.3d 1187, 1194 (9th Cir. 2007); Phelps v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
IPSO 11063-22 Smith v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 12068-22 Kelly v scottishdailyexpress.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 14035-23 Tucker v oxfordmail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 12648-22 Grandon v hadleigh.nub.news, 3 Harassment (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 01109-23 Edinburgh Rape Crisis… [read post]
