Search for: "P. v. Smith" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:43 am by Frank A. Bruno
P. 42 (“Rule 42”) consolidation in patent infringement cases post-enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Betty Boop Almost Lost Her Bling-Bling: Fleischer Studios v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:49 am by WSLL
., a Colorado corporation, v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
For some time now, the worldwide food supply has been under attack by a bacterium we know well as a generally non-trouble-making resident of the human colon (Escherichia coli), which has lately been possessed of a terrible "new" weapon in the form of Shiga toxin. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
In attempting to distinguish Smith, the Supreme Court not only created an incoherent free exercise jurisprudence but also ignored Jones v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  (See Bridgeford, supra, 202 Cal.App.4th at p. 1044; see also Johnson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:34 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: JOSHUA JORGEN HANSON v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Susan Brenner
Pandelos and three other `victims’, David Cotton, Mitchell Bender and Richard Smith, testified. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
  The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]