Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 1001 - 1020 of 9,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
ARGUMENT CLAIM I -NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE On pages 2-14 of the second successive motion, Schwab set out what he described as "newly discovered evidence" that Dr. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
ARGUMENT CLAIM I -NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE On pages 2-14 of the second successive motion, Schwab set out what he described as "newly discovered evidence" that Dr. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) To me, today’s decision of the United States District Court for the District of Utah in Brown v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm by David Markus
At long last, the en banc 11th Circuit today decided United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant cites no facts from anywhere in the United States outside New York City to establish that American citizens overwhelmingly chose air guns for "the core lawful purpose of self- Page 10 defense" (554 US at 630), rather than for sports and recreation. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:45 am by Wells Bennett
 A note to readers: business back at Brookings will keep your correspondent away from Fort Meade, and from observing, almost live and via CCTV broadcast,  a two-day pre-trial hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Thank you to "an anonymous friend" for bringing this case to my attention.In the context of a restitution motion, in United States of America v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:10 am by Scott McKeown
Aqua Products Results in De-designation of Previous Amendment Precedent In view of the decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:00 am by Justin P. Webb
Maynard and was later implicitly accepted by some justices of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]