Search for: "People v Deal" Results 1001 - 1020 of 11,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Trump was scheduled for a deposition on August 10 in the civil case People of the State of New York v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 6:23 am
Finally, Justice Brennan in New York Times v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
Yesterday in People v Figueroa, 2008 NY Slip Op 01604, the First Department was confronted with whether the trial court violated the procedure in CPL § 310.30 after receiving a somewhat unusual note from the jury foreperson. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:51 pm by Steve Gottlieb
For half a century, whenever Israel and others appeared likely to reach a peace deal or adopt a two-state solution, Hamas bombed, killed and tortured others to make any and all proposed deals impossible to conclude. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:04 pm
And being a man of the people, I will now provide the answer. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 2:28 am
I haven't read the complete record of trial in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:14 am by Kevin W Frye
“Then, in the middle of all that, we started having to deal with people who were already drinking. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am by INFORRM
In Shakeel Begg v BBC ([2016] EWHC 2688 (QB)), Haddon-Cave J held that allegations that the claimant is an extremist speaker who has promoted jihad are substantially true. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
              Well, lawyers are people too after all. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Danielle Citron
Sotomayor denounced the third-party doctrine as “ill suited to the digital age, in which people reveal a great deal of information about themselves to third parties in the course of carrying out mundane tasks. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm by Orin Kerr
My own view is that both the majority and dissent offer plausible ways to deal with the difficult problem the Court faced. [read post]