Search for: "People v Green" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 4:07 pm by Amy Howe
At the same time, the justices agreed to decide whether a group of 13 states, led by Arizona, can defend a Trump administration rule that broadened the definition of “public charge,” a term in immigration law for people who are ineligible for a green card if the government believes that they are likely to rely too heavily on government assistance. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am by Legal Beagle
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
Almost all of the MPs who spoke did so in opposition to the Government’s proposal, announced late last year, to bring forward measures to enfranchise prisoners serving less than four years in prison in response to two European Court of Human Rights (in Hirst v UK and Greens v UK) which have established that the current blanket disenfranchisement of prisoners is incompatible with the right to vote under the ECHR. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:19 am
"To all the young people here," he said, "this is your legacy. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
  It seems that the complete duplication may be “excessive”, in light of the quantity, quality and importance of the material used (Blanch v Koons).Bruno is unimpressed with the dumb Starbucks crownhe has to wear to make his significant human happyIn relation to market effects, would the hundreds of people queuing up for Dumb Starbucks have alternately visited the original coffee retailer that day? [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:08 am by John A. Sakson
This antiquated law has caused numerous unjust results, and ultimately caused the New Jersey Supreme Court to engage in Solomon – like behavior in an attempt to reconcile a very difficult situation, in Green v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]