Search for: "People v Lord" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Isabel McArdle
It has already been held that he is unable to bring any claim to test the lawfulness of his detention under the HRA (R (on the application of Al Jedda ) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 58), although, following the dismissal of that claim by the House of Lords, Mr Al Jedda made an application to the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
Hart and Lord Patrick Devlin, a judge of the English High Court on just what was the law’s business.? [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  House of Lords accepted copying of trade dress with different word mark. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 17 December 2013, the Court Martial Appeal Court (Lord Chief Justice, Tugendhat and Holroyde JJ) will give judgment in the case of R v Marines A to E. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Dave
  In Kay Lord Hope spoke of the challenge under gateway (b) being to the decision of the local authority to recover possession. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Finding people in this case to be "articles of commerce," the majority found the statute to be a form of unconstitutional discrimination against out-of-state commerce. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
Close scrutiny of any proposed social media duty of care from a rule of law perspective can help ensure that we make good law for bad people rather than bad law for good people. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am by Cyberleagle
Most people aren’t, even if they have heard of it. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am by John J. Sullivan
  The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter had it. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
The Supreme People’s Court of China ruling might be a game changer. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm by INFORRM
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 477: Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552,  and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Rosalind English
Lord Dyson concluded in Lumba that this was no justification for indefinite detention, no matter how diligent the efforts of the Home Office. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
 Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
 Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
  He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:50 am by INFORRM
The Mosley case followed earlier High Court battles that saw the courts establish the balancing exercise between Article 10 and Article 8, in particular the House of Lords decision in Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]