Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
United States: In People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:49 am
Paul Chambers v DPP [2012] EWHC 2157 - Read judgment The famous ‘Twitter joke’ conviction of Paul Chambers has been overturned on appeal, bringing welcome clarity to what is and what is not an offence of this type. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
One of the hallmarks of totalitarian regimes is their insistence on controlling people’s thoughts as well as their behaviour. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
As with Entick, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
Khaira & Ors v Shergill & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 983 (17 July 2012). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
The result of this confusion is that LGBT's see themselves as "victims", and people like V. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
Brown v Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, per Lord Steyn). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm
In the late 19th century, Lord Shand observed at page 1113 of Godfrey v W & D C Thomson (1890) 17 R 1108: “… I think that in these times persons must be allowed to speak pretty freely of public political conduct and principles …” Mr Crow aruged that the leaflets were capable of meaning that he was one of those involved in the scandals, waste and other matters referred to. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:28 pm
From United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
But from this week in Scottish courts, people helping them with their cases, who are known as McKenzie friends, will be granted the right to speak for them. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
Hunt v Times. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
Veterans of the UK prisoners votes cases will know about Roach v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
The Guardian reports that Lord Justice Leveson has used his powers under section 21 of the Inquiries Act 2005 to order newspaper editors to say whether they agree with the detailed proposals submitted last month by Lord Black of Brentwood for regulation of the press. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
"The case is not, strictly, a family case as it involves a property that was purchased by two people who were simply friends - a scenario that is surely becoming more common, as property prices increase. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Lord Phillips queries whether, on the facts, there is sufficient control. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:14 am
Is this some internet version of Lord of the Flies? [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
The EBA, while being aware of the use of T258/03-Hitachi and T641/00-Comvik, stated circa May 2010: “We note, in passing, that it is somewhat surprising that the referral does not address any of its questions to the validity of this way of judging an inventive step, an issue which is surely of general interest (and one which Lord Justice Jacob proposed should be put to the Enlarged Board – “How should those elements of a claim that relate to excluded subject matter be… [read post]
Golden Anniversary: The Supreme Court’s Engel Decision Protected Religious Liberty In Public Schools
22 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
One year later, the Supreme Court struck down mandatory Bible reading and recitation of the Lord’s Prayer in Abington Township School District v. [read post]
