Search for: "People v. Bounds" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Dave
   The Court of Appeal considered themselves bound by Danesh v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC [2006] EWCA Civ 1404, despite the fact that the Code of Guidance had defined “violence” more broadly, but, in any event, they rather agreed with the narrow take on “violence” in Danesh. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
In doing so, we are bound by the trial court's express and implicit factual findings if there is constitutionally sufficient evidence in the record to support them. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
In its landmark 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
Said Beyond Retro, given the similarity of the marks and the fact that both were for clothing in Class 25, there was bound to be a likelihood of confusion among the relevant class of consumers [presumably people in Europe who wear clothes, guesses Merpel, who is greatly attached to her own fur coat but wears nothing underneath]. [read post]