Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,949
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 9:02 am
” “Getting more germs out of the chicken and turkey we eat is an important step in protecting people from foodborne illness,” said Robert V. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
To be sure, justices are people, and people have biases, usually in favor of their own groups. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Nucci v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
In the recent case of People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Thus I consider a sample consisting of people who have rented in the last 10 years or would consider doing so in the future is perfectly reasonable. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
[He] certified that he received [the defendant's] blood sample intact with the seal unbroken, that he checked to make sure that the forensic report number and the sample number corresponded, and that he performed on [the] sample a particular test, adhering to a precise protocol. . . .These representations, relating to past events and human actions not revealed in raw, machine-produced data, are meet [sic] for cross-examination.State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:51 am
This exact scenario in the example was upheld in the case of Shapira v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:15 pm
Levow is a DWI attorney who fights for the rights of people in New Jersey who are facing charges that could significantly affect their lives. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:10 am
Samples here, here, here, here, here, here, and elsewhere (just type Carcieri into TT’s search engine). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
However, late in 2014, in People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm
Norovirus is highly contagious and can spread anywhere people gather or food is served, making people sick with vomiting and diarrhea. [16]“Norovirus outbreaks from contaminated food in restaurants are far too common. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
Sampling of musical recordings is a topic that excites a lot of people in the United States, where the bulk of the world's litigation on that subject appears to have taken place. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:19 am
In People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:40 am
And these stories—only a sampling of the dozens we documented this year—are not exceptional but all too terribly common. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:52 am
The only categorical exclusion in Canada to the search incident to arrest doctrine was with bodily samples in R. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:11 pm
Specificity really does keep registrants honest.A: Not a requirement of overkill: generally need a label sample, explain channel of trade. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:55 pm
Jones, 214 Ill.2d187 (2005) and People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
More here. and more on music sampling here. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
The people who need it the most just don’t show up. [read post]
