Search for: "People v. Shields" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Civil rights groups – including the ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and People for the American Way – that initially supported RFRA have split off and now actively oppose it. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Statements of President Obama  made today (June 22, 2012) in celebration of the 13th anniversary of the June 22, 1999 Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
These security services are directly responsible for the repression of the Cuban people. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Government has added two new duties to the proposed Online Safety Bill  that are aimed at protecting people against anonymous online abuse. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by Hugh Rennie
Likewise, the 2021 case of Bear Creek Bible Church v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
For some related though different thoughts on the subject by Justice Scalia, see his concurrence in Sable Communications v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
This is the first case in which a lower court will examine how to apply the Supreme Court's ruling last Wednesday in the campaign finance case, Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:34 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
One of the more infamous examples of the legal risks faced by companies who use staffing agency employees is Vizcaino v. [read post]