Search for: "R. Held, et al. v. State, et al." Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
However, given the court’s precedent, the court held that the EEOC’s argument that Houston Funding discharged the employee because she was lactating or expressing milk stated a cognizable sex discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 9:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
County of Tehama, et al. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th1217 The court held that the disclosure of documents to the real party in interest by agency counsel does not waive the attorney-client privilege when the disclosure of documents is necessary to accomplish the purpose of defending the CEQA lawsuit. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected each of these theories, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety as a matter of law this past week in Dimond, et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:33 am by Michelle C. Laubin
Niehoff, et al. was decided and issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 25, 2011. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:04 am by Jeffrey D. Polsky
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group, et al., a doctor refused to finalize a settlement containing a no-rehire clause. [read post]