Search for: "Randy Barnett" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2008, 10:30 am
Barnett, a constitutional scholar at the Georgetown University Law Center. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:31 pm by Orin Kerr
Randy Barnett has argued that the presumption of constitutionality is wrong, for example, and I believe Ilya Somin agrees. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
I have in mind big-name libertarian scholars and commentators such as Tyler Cowen, Richard Epstein, Virginia Postrel, and co-blogger Randy Barnett. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am by Erin Miller
  At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr predicts that the Court’s silence on the Privileges or Immunities Clause incorporation option indicates that the Justices “clearly had it in mind to incorporate the Second Amendment via Due Process”; by contrast, Randy Barnett interprets that same silence as a sign of tacit agreement on the point. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 7:10 am
  Speakers include: Randy E, Barnett, Mark A. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm by vm40@duke.edu
In a Volokh Conspiracy post, Professor Randy Barnett of Georgetown also said Siegel and Cooter seem to have "anticipated" the Chief Justice's approach in their paper. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 7:15 am
  Update:  Randy Barnett at Volokh, just wee bit late to the party, agrees. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:56 pm by Barbara Moreno
FIRST AMENDMENT Randy Bobbitt, Free Speech on America’s K-12 and College Campuses: Legal Cases from Barnette to Blaine, (2017). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Finally, as usual, Volokh Conspiracy has a number of insightful posts on the topic, including these by Eugene Volokh, Randy Barnett, Ilya Somin, Dale Carpenter, and Jim Lindgren. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:16 pm by Steve Bainbridge
If Daschle tries, Bush ought to ratchet things up by following Randy Barnett's suggestion: The one real power Republicans have over the Democrats in this fight is the recess-appointment power. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am by Amy Howe
  The Cato Institute has filed an amicus brief in support of EPIC, which authors Jim Harper and Randy Barnett discuss at Cato’s blog. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:28 am by Calvin TerBeek
" (Restoration is a common theme invoked by originalists and constitutional conservatives cum libertarians (see Randy Barnett, Richard Epstein, Charles Murray, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, among others). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:41 am by Mark Graber
That distinction now plays a role in the work of such important scholars as Lawrence Solum and Randy Barnett. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 4:58 pm
  Even Scalia has said he wouldn't support a pure originalism in Eighth Amendment cases (this is what triggered the whole "faint-hearted originalism" discussion with Randy Barnett and others). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:02 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
" The witnesses — Oregon Attorney General John Kroger, lawyer Michael Carvin, and law professors Randy Barnett, Walter Dellinger, and Charles Fried — all immediately agreed [ADDED: with the first option]. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:00 am by Andrew Coan
In recent years, originalists ranging from Jack Balkin to Keith Whittington to Randy Barnett have argued in varying fashion that an originalist interpretive approach follows logically from “our commitment to a written constitution. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:29 pm
Conservative Georgetown University constitutional scholar Randy Barnett told Thomson Reuters, for example, that tort law has historically been under the sole purview of state law. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
” Some scholars, Robert Bork and Randy Barnett amongst them, have argued that although Bolling is indefensible as an originalist matter, this is not a real problem. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 11:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
 And in that case, what purpose is there even to admit the possibility of Co-Conspirator Randy Barnett’s opinions? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:26 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Maybe conservatives won: Ezra Klein reports Randy Barnett saying “we won” on the arguments but not the result, though Michael Walsh says conservatives need to stop kidding themselves. [read post]