Search for: "Reed v. Reed"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
However, in the 1983 case of INS v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 12:10 pm
Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 5:16 am
In Amaya v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
American Beverage Ass’ v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 5:15 am
The court has ruled in Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look at the ransomware phenomenon, how companies are responding, and why. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
Most important however was his stand on Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Reed and Lord Kerr dissented stating that the critical factors in the ECtHR decision of Allen should have been followed and consequently it is necessary for the Secretary of State to examine the judgment of the Court of Appeal to determine whether the criteria of s 133 were satisfied. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
” Dissent in Murdock v Pennsylvania Justice Reed authored a dissent, in which Justices Frankfurter, Jackson, and Roberts joined. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The appointing authority adopted the hearing officer's findings and recommendation and terminated Thomas' employment, whereupon Thomas filed a petition pursuant Article 78 of the CPLR seeking a judicial review of the Town's action.The Appellate Division dismissed Thomas' appeal, explaining that any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer (see Matter of Reed v Raynor, 151 AD3d 730), and substantial evidence in the record supported the… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The appointing authority adopted the hearing officer's findings and recommendation and terminated Thomas' employment, whereupon Thomas filed a petition pursuant Article 78 of the CPLR seeking a judicial review of the Town's action.The Appellate Division dismissed Thomas' appeal, explaining that any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer (see Matter of Reed v Raynor, 151 AD3d 730), and substantial evidence in the record supported the… [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
Why The SEC Shutdown Must End (Now) by John Reed Stark It is not surprising that the SEC has only filed one civil action in federal court since the shutdown began, which was a parallel action brought alongside the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
The Claim form and Particulars of Claim are available on Lawtel [£] On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker,. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
In the case of Mader v. [read post]
