Search for: "Regents of the University of California" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Kristin E. Hickman
Regents of the University of California involved the legality of executive actions related to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Adam Faderewski
Culver Jr. received his law degree from the University of Texas School of Law in 1914. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 2:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In upholding the validity of EIR addendums generally under CEQA – as well as affirming the trial court’s judgment denying petitioner Save Our Heritage Organisation’s (SOHO) mandamus petition challenging the City of San Deigo’s (City) Addendum for revisions to the Plaza de Panama project (project) at Balboa Park – the Court answered an important question expressly left unaddressed by the California Supreme Court in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, the appellate court said, “Although the level of detail will vary depending upon an alternative's potential for feasibility, in every case, the EIR must disclose the ‘analytic route the…agency traveled from evidence to action. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, the appellate court said, “Although the level of detail will vary depending upon an alternative's potential for feasibility, in every case, the EIR must disclose the ‘analytic route the…agency traveled from evidence to action. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Regents of the University of California comes from Naaz Modan at Education Dive. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court Columbia: Record breaking… [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Securi [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
On the 149th anniversary of the 14th Amendment this weekend, Constitution Daily looks at 10 historic Supreme Court cases about due process and equal protection under the law. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:28 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 396, the court explained that: “an EIR must include an analysis of the environmental effects of future expansion or other action if 1) it is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the initial project and 2) the future expansion or action will be significant in that it will likely change the scope or nature of the initial project or its environmental effects. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in the case Regents of the University of California, et al. v. [read post]