Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Based on a poorly developed record, the court cannot conclude that the prosecution sustained its burden of establishing probable cause akin to People v Hargroves, People v Sanchez, People v Sellers, People v Yiu C. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm by John Chierichella and Keith Szeliga
  Second, irrespective of whether the target performs classified work, the parties must consider the role of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm by John Chierichella
  Second, irrespective of whether the target performs classified work, the parties must consider the role of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Second, the Court of Appeals adumbrated the key rule as whether the “seller incurred irrevocable liability with the United States to deliver a security” or that “title was transferred within the United States”. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The Court of Appeals’ exhaustive and painstaking analysis led to the conclusion, simply stated, non-U.S. sellers but U.S. buyers are not excluded from the reach of the U.S. antitrust laws. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
When he bought the land, the seller reserved the mineral estate and the land was then subject to an oil and gas lease. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
The certification also stated plaintiff “[understood] that [defendant] reserve[d] the right to null and void the auction and sale of the unit for any reason. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
Afterwards, he joined the United States Attorney's Office in Chicago, where he served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Criminal Division. [read post]