Search for: "STATE TAX COURTS JUDICIAL" Results 1001 - 1020 of 5,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 5:23 pm by Rick Hills
Justice Milton Tingling of the New York supreme court (that's a trial judge for you non-New Yorkers) struck down Mayor Bloomberg's soda portion cap this afternoon, citing the state non-delegation doctrine and the state's administrative law constraint on arbitrary and capricious rule-making. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am by Eoin Daly
” Reading the a.35.5 rule against the broader principle of judicial independence, Kingsmill-Moore J held that it would only preclude taxes that would ““worsen [a judge’s] position vis-a-vis the rest of the citizens of the State”. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:46 pm
Article III defines the powers and limitations of "the judicial power of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
(4) In the case of a request for extradition emanating from the United States, when the imposition or the execution of punishment for the offense for which extradition is requested would be barred by reasons prescribed under the laws of Japan, including lapse of time; (a) if Japan were to have jurisdiction over the offense, or (b) if Japan in fact has such jurisdiction and the trial were to be held in its court. 2. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
On the federal level, the United States Supreme Court has held that a valid disclaimer does not defeat a federal tax lien levied under IRC § 6321, Dyre, Jr. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case makes an important point about the procedure in § 1782 cases, and so as not to bury the lede, I’ll just state the point here: It is proper to apply ex parte for judicial assistance. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 10:33 am by Michele Berger
On a judicial front, Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed to the Supreme Court, ushering in a more conservative court and an understanding that there is much more progress to be made in believing women. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 25 March 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Elgizouli (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by ArticIe 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be an extraditable offense: a) whether or not the laws in the Requesting and Requested States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; b) whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation, or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting… [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:31 am by Richard Pildes
  In some areas, such as tax, it is well-known that the relevant congressional committees constantly update the tax code, including in response to judicial decisions. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm by Mark Graber
  White supremacists in the post-bellum South could only dream of such judicial solicitudeKorematsu and Williams frame Justice Anthony Kennedy’s legacy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm by Charles Fried
He was Solicitor General of the United States, 1985-89, and an Associate Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 1995-99. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Priscilla Smith
  The Court can choose “nothing” again, insisting that conducting these determinations is beyond the “judicial ken. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am by The Legal Blog
Without entering into niceties and technicality of the subject, we venture to state the broad general difference between the two jurisdictions. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:05 am
There's also a Traffic Court Rules Committee, Rules of Evidence Committee and Appellate Rules Committee.Over the past few years, the Florida Supreme Court has given more power to the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee to make rules regarding criminal practice. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The courts do not decide or disturb tax rates or interest rates. [read post]