Search for: "STATE V. MARTINEZ"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05 Cress v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:31 am
" Plaintiff alleges that he did not know that under the applicable tax laws the necessary funds were not "immediately available" — we must accept that allegation as true (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]) —- and that a reasonably competent matrimonial attorney who read the stipulation would not have advised him to sign it. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:25 am
” “Here, even accepting the facts as alleged in the amended complaint to be true and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), the amended complaint failed to state a cause of action for legal malpractice. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:05 am
The article highlights the People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
Yesterday, in Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:15 am
Even though the April 16 Baze v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:56 pm
As pointed out in the Sui Generis-a New York Law Blog, at issue in Martinez v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 3:54 pm
Instead of following Martinez, Nahman cited Funderburke v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:12 am
Martinez, Mahesha P. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:23 am
The style of the case is Mario Santacruz v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
at ___ (Martinez, J., dissenting).In this Court, the Borrowers assert the same substantive arguments that they did in the court of appeals. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Martinez (2005) 406 F.3d 1160. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:08 am
Adolfo Martinez-Lopez SUFFOLLK COUNTYCriminal PracticePreclusion Denied; Defendant's Ability To Engage in Motion Practice Not Impaired by Minor Errors People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
A contemporaryexample is the six Star Wars movies: Episodes IV, V, andVI were produced before I, II, and III. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:49 am
” (United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm
Referring to last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:20 am
The court specifically addressed sobriety checkpoints in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
