Search for: "STATE v MYERS" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2007, 1:55 am
Even if a small dosage which it was now apparent could result in successful treatment, rather than the much larger doses mentioned in '382, that was just a different dosing regime.This decision looks right to the IPKat and appears to fall within the rule articulated by the Court of Appeal in the Taxol case, Bristol-Myers Squibb v Baker Norton here. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:51 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
North Carolina Supreme Court Finds No Prejudicial Error Where Deliberating Jury Viewed Exhibits Without Defendant’s Consent In State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
The agency’s argument that the regulation leaves the decision up to the employer was unavailing, the court explained, under the competitor standing doctrine and had already been rejected in earlier cases, such as Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 353 F.3d 848, 852 (10th Cir. 2003); In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 955 F. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am by Erin Miller
Myers (09-451): originally conference of February 19 Belleque v. [read post]