Search for: "STATE v. OLSON"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
”) What Mad Men doesn’t say is that abortion remained illegal (except in rare circumstances) in New York until 1970 (three years before Roe v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:40 am
" The American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER) was created to fund plaintiffs' representation in Perry v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
In its appeal (Campaign for California Families v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
Elena Kagan is the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 3:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:49 pm
This week, an appeals court ruled on the latest case to come down the pike (er, the tracks) - Bacic v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:13 pm
") AC28735 - State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:23 pm
For a case out of little Connecticut, the Ricci v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:44 am
But experts say it is more of a tossup to predict whether Olson and Boies succeed in their ultimate goal, which is prevailing in the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:42 am
Although Boies and Olson also argue that Prop. 8 fails to satisfy the "rational basis" standard of constitutionality, the ACLU and NCLR examine the unique circumstances under which it does:Considering the unique circumstances surrounding its enactment and stated intent of stripping same-sex couples of the status of mariage while leaving intact all of the other substantive rights of same-sex couples, the sole purpose of Proposition 8 manifestly is to establish a… [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:49 pm
Olson & Co., P.C., 906 N.E. 2d 201 (Ind. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
Olson, 283 U. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:44 am
Olson and David Boies, who represented opposing sides in the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 3:07 am
The study, was authored by Nicole V. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:56 am
As a result, the ruling in NRA v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:40 am
Another is that the other lawyer is David Boies; Boies and Olson squared off as opposing counsel in Bush v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:03 am
They are claiming that state constitutional bans, such as Prop. 8, violate the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:03 am
They are claiming that state constitutional bans, such as Prop. 8, violate the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. [read post]