Search for: "STATE v. PHILLIPS" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Ruth Levush
(v. 1. of 1727 ed), Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2003653394/ Who was Dante Alighieri? [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on last week’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:45 am by Gene Quinn
In a nutshell, these new rules change existing practice by allowing new testimonial evidence to be submitted with a patent owner’s preliminary response, adding a Rule 11-type certification for papers filed in a proceeding, allowing a claim construction approach that emulates the approach used by a district court following Phillips v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 8:17 am by Phillips & Associates
Phillips & Associates’ pregnancy discrimination attorneys advocate for the rights of job applicants, employees, and former employees in New York City in claims brought under local, state, and federal employment laws. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
”  In The Washington Post, Amber Phillips reports on the change of heart by Republican Senator Jerry Moran, “who went from indicating Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland should get a hearing to stating flatly that he shouldn’t. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
 Up to now, Cuozzo has not explained how a Phillips claim construction would impact the outcome of its inter partes review. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:51 am by Amy Howe
Gillie and the prisoner exhaustion case Ross v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:18 am by Phillips & Associates
The sexual harassment attorneys at Phillips & Associates help New York City employees and job applicants assert claims under city, state, and federal law for unlawful employment practices. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
  At issue in Simmons v. [read post]
Carter Phillips, the Respondents’ counsel, brilliantly summarized the policy’s implication of this case as a problem of “pirates v. trolls. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:20 pm by D. Daxton White
It seems like your Exxons your Conical Phillips, your BP, you know they have a very long-term horizon, they’re loo [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm by Ilya Somin
He has long defended the Supreme Court’s notorious decision in Kelo v. [read post]