Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 21,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
Volkman, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:36 am
An example of a recent case in which a Texas federal judge dealt a blow to a developer by allowing a group of salespersons to proceed together as a class is Edwards v. [read post]
10 Feb 2006, 9:25 am
The 10th Circuit recently issued an opinion in an interesting case involving issues of (1) unauthorized sales of genuine products and (2) use of the trademark holder's mark on the Internet in various ways.In Australian Gold, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:01 am
UMG Recordings v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 8:33 am
Testa and Defender Security v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
Another interesting objection to the Chrysler sale motion comes from the State of Connecticut. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:05 am
In Ark Encounter, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in particular in cases involving Internet sales. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:37 am
Moreover, a dairy farmer cannot escape the raw milk sales prohibition by selling the milk across the border in a neighboring state. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
The case is Rackspace US Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
” Judge Sammartino emphasized the inherent conflict, stating that “Amylin certainly has an interest in controlling the release and use of confidential information to a sales force promoting what it views as a competitive product. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:09 am
Promega Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 9:49 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am
But before closing off we make two points:In First Options of Chicago v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:37 am
McWilliams v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:58 pm
Alcatel Lucent and Sunoco v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
Johnson truthfully stated to the PTO that the invention was not on sale or in public use before the critical date, despite weak evidence of pre-critical date activity, because from Mr. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
In the mainstream press, the San Francisco Chronicle reports that "State Supreme Court nixes sales of shoes made with kangaroo hide" and the Los Angeles Times reports that "Adidas' use of kangaroo hide is illegal, state justices say. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
The opinion in Nelson v. [read post]
