Search for: "Sample v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 4,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:23 pm
Cornhusker Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 2:10 am
Prior to the United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:57 pm
United States, 850 F.3d 1343 (Fed. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
As we stated in that post, the 6-4 en banc decision by the CAFC in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am
H argued that this was wrong and stated that the exclusion of 16 properties from a sample of just 111 demonstrated that the 16 properties were not really so exceptional. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am
H argued that this was wrong and stated that the exclusion of 16 properties from a sample of just 111 demonstrated that the 16 properties were not really so exceptional. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:45 am
Simpson… In State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 1:15 pm
Haskell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 11:20 am
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
The Ohio Supreme court tackled that issue a year ago in State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:51 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 10:00 am
Shahin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 11:22 am
Samples, samples, samples. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Sitz and Delaware v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
