Search for: "Sells v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 15,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2017, 5:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion when it denied the part of the motion which requested attorney fees (Difone v Difone 87 D3d 971, Taormina v Taormina 131 AD3 696). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:58 am by LindaMBeale
The best answer, then, would be for the Supreme Court to revisit its conclusion in the 1992 case Quill Corporation v North Dakota, which required a physical presence in order for states to mandate collection of their sales taxes by companies that make sales to their residents. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:31 pm
Teva (appeal from denial of preliminary injunction to stop teva from selling a generic version of the ulcer med Protonix); and D Beam v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
His judgment stated that “the harm caused by the repudiation of the promise is not the same as the detriment suffered. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
OTR sued West, asserting various claims under the Lanham Act and state law. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:22 pm
The Court's reasoning: In its decision Tuesday, the appeals court cited Lawrence and Garner v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:00 pm
Generally, remote sellers can be any business that sells goods or services from one state to another. [read post]