Search for: "Small v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 16,887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:18 pm by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
On May 19, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its split opinion in Clark, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:18 am by Kristin Johnson
Supreme Court just announced that it will weigh in on this case, Vidal v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
& C. 4th 251, 257 (2003), or that the TV program Born Innocent led some underage viewers to sexually attack a small child in copying a scene shown on the program, Olivia N. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:29 am by David Pocklington
The proposal will result in the provision of about 571 new burial spaces; 202 in Section V and 369 in Section 5 [8] [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:52 am by Richard Hunt
Under these cases, the owner could not shift even a small part of the liability to the responsible parties. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Regular readers of Short Circuit will remember that the Fifth Circuit made quite a stir when it held, in Jarkesy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Bill Marler
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Mary Sullivan
Supreme Court decided AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
At least in the context of numbers of one race v. another race in a district, regardless of the shape of the district, states may have to take into account the total percentage of a minority and make sure their redistricting does not dilute that race's voting power. [read post]