Search for: "Soling v. New York State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
Feb. 28, 2014)), Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But remember that many states, including New York, prohibit campaigning within 100 feet of any polling place, and those restrictions are legal.The Court starts with a forum analysis. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:42 am by Peter Mahler
The allegations do not show that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (see Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131 [2d Dept 2010]; Schindler v Niche Media Holdings, 1 Misc 3d 713, 716 [Sup Ct, New York County 2003]). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:16 am by Peter Mahler
Braland had not previously formed a LLC, so he studied the Iowa LLC statutes and obtained a template of a farm LLC from the Iowa State Bar Association. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Divorce Lawyer said that thereafter, a series of litigation between the parties ensued. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
Today we report on a biting decision from the City Court of Mount Vernon (New York), captioned LVNV Funding v Guest [1]. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:04 pm by Daniel Solove
  If I say that “Yankee fans are morons” in New York City, I certainly wouldn’t want to face a jury trial there brought by an offended fan. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York held that a third exception to CAFA (28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
**For the full text of the decision, go to:http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2007/02/no-right-to-name-clearing-hearing.html* The “New York Rule” in such situations is discussed in Ortiz v Ward, 546 NYS2d 624. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
The District Court noted that the defendants were not residents of Connecticut; Moody’s and Fitch were incorporated in Delaware, and had a principal place of business in New York; and McGraw-Hill was incorporated and had a place of business in New York. [read post]