Search for: "Soling v. New York State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
Martone, P.C., New York) presented on “Recent changes to PTAB IPR practice, how far do they go and who do they help? [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
” With that statement, in Paddison v Paddison, Civil Action No. 19-2109 [U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:35 am
The District Court in Brammer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am
A bill to end the religious exemption has been introduced in the New York legislature by Sen. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:25 am
State St. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals opined in Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] "expresses this State's strong commitment to open government and public accountability and imposes a broad standard of disclosure upon the State and its agencies. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals opined in Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] "expresses this State's strong commitment to open government and public accountability and imposes a broad standard of disclosure upon the State and its agencies. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm
I): Structures and Powers (Oxford University Press: New York). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
"Citing Matter of Di Vito v State of New York, Dept. of Labor, 48 N.Y.2d 761, the Appellate Division explained that considering "the broad discretion afforded to an administrative agency in cases involving internal discipline," it would not substitute its judgment for that of the appointing authority.Addressing the employee's "retaliation defense" for whistle-blowing asserted in her answer [see Civil Service Law… [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
"Citing Matter of Di Vito v State of New York, Dept. of Labor, 48 N.Y.2d 761, the Appellate Division explained that considering "the broad discretion afforded to an administrative agency in cases involving internal discipline," it would not substitute its judgment for that of the appointing authority.Addressing the employee's "retaliation defense" for whistle-blowing asserted in her answer [see Civil Service Law… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
The red sole is valid and infringed, says the Court of The HagueChristian Louboutin v Van Haren Schoenen BV C/09/450182 / HA ZA 13-999, Court of The Hague (February 2019)For the first time Retromark strays beyond its UK/EU-level remit, in order to see the legendary red sole saga through to its conclusion in the Dutch courts. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
The 28-year-old respondent, an American citizen, was born in Brooklyn, New York, and resided in New York. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
Perhaps it’s because New York is the center of the legal universe and the home state of thousands of law firms. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
& N.J., 52 AD3d 303, pointed out that although a bi-state entity, the Authority "is subject to New York's laws involving health and safety, insofar as its activities may externally affect the public. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
& N.J., 52 AD3d 303, pointed out that although a bi-state entity, the Authority "is subject to New York's laws involving health and safety, insofar as its activities may externally affect the public. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:41 am
It was created in New York by a settlor who was a New York resident. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:48 am
Most judicial dissolution cases in New York courts involve a single entity. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
The petitioner [Plaintiff] in this action appealed the federal district court's dismissal of his claims that members of a hiring committee at a State University of New York campus discriminated against him based on his age and disability and violated his First Amendment rights to free speech and academic freedom to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
The petitioner [Plaintiff] in this action appealed the federal district court's dismissal of his claims that members of a hiring committee at a State University of New York campus discriminated against him based on his age and disability and violated his First Amendment rights to free speech and academic freedom to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. [read post]
