Search for: "Starks v State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
I have previously commented on Sorrell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:08 pm
Wash., 2013) Starke v Gilt Groupe, Inc (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:20 pm
On Tuesday, in Nuziard v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
The Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:29 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
This is in stark contrast to prior cases in the Third and Eleventh circuits that stated that consent could in fact be revoked. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:15 am
Last week, in Rivera v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
That is, the court held that where the legislature granted wide discretion to the agency, such as to “have regard to” stated factors in taking a decision, a court should go no further than ensuring that the agency, in fact, has taken account of the stated factors and “struck a reasonable equilibrium between them”. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Stark and Ezekiel J. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:53 am
Shapiro v Ettenson, 2019 NY Slip Op 33793(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 23, 2019]. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
(b) The occasional rendering of services in this state by a physician if the physician: (I) Is licensed and lawfully practicing medicine in another state or territory of the United States without restrictions or conditions on the physician's license; (II) Does not have any established or regularly used medical staff membership or clinical privileges in this state; (III) Is not party to any contract, agreement, or understanding to provide services in this… [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
Texas Sec. of State, 2020 WL 5367216 (W.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:40 pm
Washington, a dispute between states over Washington’s denial of access to its ports to ship coal from Montana and Wyoming overseas; Hughes v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:51 am
Although June Medical v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
He [Jan Luba QC] submits that the stark choice the judge perceived to be applicable was between the land being “taken” by the occupiers and the owner being “deprived” of it and the immediate eviction of the occupiers: see paragraphs [83] and [85] of her judgment. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
He [Jan Luba QC] submits that the stark choice the judge perceived to be applicable was between the land being “taken” by the occupiers and the owner being “deprived” of it and the immediate eviction of the occupiers: see paragraphs [83] and [85] of her judgment. [read post]
