Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The Court concluded that states "must employ a more discernible approach than the one Minnesota has offered here. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Simon Chester
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, Filed: December 10, 1999. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
Mensing’s claim was denied in Minnesota District Court, which claimed that state tort laws were preempted by the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FDCA). [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
At the CrimProf Blog, Kevin Cole worries that District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  That left intact a Minnesota Supreme Court decision in favor of that state’s ban on same-sex unions. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:10 am by Lawrence Solum
Virginia State Board of Elections86 and property ownership in Kramer v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:53 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 9/7/11Cite: Thiesing v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:14 am
 Ruling without full briefing or a hearing, and with no dissent noted, the Court apparently overturned the death sentence of a Florida veteran whose "combat service unfortunately left him a traumatized, changed man," as the Court put it in Porter v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:44 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
As of the end of June 2015, approximately 9.9 million consumers had enrolled: 7.2 million through the federal Marketplaces and the so-called Healthcare.gov states and 2.7 million through the state based Marketplaces (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia). [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm by Law Lady
District Court for the District of Delaware.Health Care Fraud: OMNICARE, IVAX SETTLE KICKBACK CHARGES FOR $112 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
 For example, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently issued an injunction in a trademark dispute applying the long-standing (at least in the United States) presumption of irreparable harm in the case Gold’s Gym Licensing LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]