Search for: "State of Minnesota v. United States"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 5:23 am
Bramacint, (Civil No. 09-1225; October 1, 2010), a United States District Court of Minnesota case, a debt collector allegedly accessed a debtor's MySpace page to intimidate the debtor. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
While my preferred jurisdiction in which to follow patent infringement cases is the United States, I obviously benefit in different ways from the not only continuing but even increasing importance of German courts, especially the ones in Munich and Mannheim, as injunction hotspots in major technology patent disputes.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
This law is administered by the United States Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:53 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 9/7/11Cite: Thiesing v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:44 am
Fresh produce: a growing cause of outbreaks of foodborne illness in the United States, 1973 through 1997. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Seized Account Funds Must Be Returned; Lis Pendens Against 'Substitute' Forfeitable Properties Vacated United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, (1999) and Murphy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
And for those who doubt the existence of karma, it came back to him the next day, when the United States Supreme Court affirmed his decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
In Hardstone Brick (1928), for example, the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the blue-sky administrator’s finding that the sale of stock for a brickmaking company whose incorporators had no experience in the business “would operate as a fraud on the purchasing public. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Sun Life and Health Insurance Company et. al) and the other in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Spartanburg Division (Duane Easler v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:21 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the plaintiffs (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
And while New York recently became just the sixth state to deviate from that, the Maryland legislature rejected the same effort this year, and the Minnesota legislature voted to place a marriage protection amendment on their state ballot in 2012. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
The decision was a clear break with the near-unanimous results of federal trial and appeals courts in the wake of the Justices’ ruling last year in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
"We note that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has released its position -- that it is a fair use for a patent applicant to submit a copy of non-patent art to the patent office to fulfill the disclosure requirement imposed by the patent regulations. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:26 am
Volungus, 595 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 10:52 am
This was made clear in the 1972, Texas Supreme Court case, The Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
