Search for: "State of Montana v. United States" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 6:31 am
    The government filed a petition for mandamus in the Ninth United States Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the ruling. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM)   United States   US General  Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
However, this moment is much more  encompassing than right v. left or  red v. blue. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:17 pm
Trial Courts Bulletin: This week we feature a case relating to a challenge to a tribal court search warrant in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Mass. 1993), aff'd, 39 F.3d 384 (1st Cir. 1994).Montana: Davis v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Overriding Pennsylvania law to permit cross-jurisdictional class action tolling in federal court of state law economic loss claims.Stone v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Says lawprof Neal Kumar Katyal, who is representing the state of Louisiana as it seeks to reopen the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]