Search for: "State v West" Results 1001 - 1020 of 9,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am by Liskow & Lewis
On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:41 am
It contained an arbitration clause which stated that, in the event of disagreement or dispute, the parties should appoint an arbitrator in Paris. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:01 pm
Hoffman, The promises and perils of international institutional bypasses: defining a new concept and its policy implications for global governance Victor V. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm by Grace Feldman
 If not, today’s headnote might make you want to subscribe:A dog cannot recover for emotional distress.Obserschlake v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Also filing briefs as Amici Curiae, or friends of the court, in support of Petitioners are the City of Los Angeles and the West Adams for Clear Skies. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:20 pm
A December 12, 2013 pretrial order set the first of four bellwether cases, Serrano v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:46 pm by California Attorney, Michael Ehline
Jim Griffin the rollover crash occurred at approximately 5:30 a.m. on Imperial Highway in the vicinity west of Berry Street. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm by WIMS
The Lands Council and Wild West Institute challenged the United States Forest Service's (Forest Service) decision to thin 277 acres of old-growth forest in the Mission Brush Project (Project) area, located in the Idaho Panhandle National Forest (IPNF), claiming that the Project violates the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), the IPNF Plan, and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
Sage has just brought out a 4-volume set on State of Social Justice in India edited by Ranabir Samaddar. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:24 am by John Bellinger
” The panel’s very cautious approach to application of the ATS to non-state actors may be some indicator of how the DC Circuit might address the question of corporate liability under the ATS, which a different panel (but that also includes Judge Rogers) is currently considering in Doe v. [read post]