Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
At first instance, which was before either Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 or Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 were handed down, the District Judge did not consider proportionality at all and a possession order was granted.There was then an appeal to HHJ Simpkiss.Mr H “is a young man of 21 years old. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
At first instance, which was before either Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 or Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 were handed down, the District Judge did not consider proportionality at all and a possession order was granted.There was then an appeal to HHJ Simpkiss.Mr H “is a young man of 21 years old. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
Starbucks Secret menu hereCat Poop Coffee v Starbucks Coffee here (yes, you read that correctly) [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
New Mexico state government Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Tribal In-House Counsel Assn. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am by S
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am by Ray Dowd
For four years, David was the solicitor for the Borough of Swarthmore, and now serves on the Swarthmore Borough Authority.Joseph Petersen is a partner in the Intellectual Property group in the New York office of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:15 am by Rosalind English
This purely subjective approach – assessing costs on the basis of a particular  claimant  - did not fulfil the Aarhus requirements as interpreted by  Suliivan LJ in R (Garner) v Elmbridge Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1006. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:52 am by Liz Campbell
Section 6(3) states that it is immaterial whether a belief is justified or not if it is honestly held. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Pinsky, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe, New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance President and CEO Roland Lewis, and an array of New York City waterfront advocates. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
StringerFeaturing Special Guests NY State Senator Tom Duane and NY State Assemblymember Daniel J. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]