Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 8,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
The parties debated them forcefully on the House and Senate floor, in state houses, and in campaigns up and down the ballot. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:57 am
This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:24 am
Kelly v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm
Livn Worldwide Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:09 am
These changes are: (1) requiring plan sponsors to target all core chronic diseases identified by CMS, codifying the current 9 core chronic diseases and adding HIV/AIDS for a total of 10 core chronic diseases; (2) lowering the maximum number of covered Part D drugs a sponsor may require from 8 to 5 drugs and requiring sponsors to include all Part D maintenance drugs in their targeting criteria; and (3) revising the methodology for calculating the cost threshold ($4,935 in… [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
” F.C.C. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:51 am
It is a criminal hate speech law that would violate core principles of the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
It is important, though, to keep in mind that those policy choices that produce long lines, scarcity, and infrastructure inefficiencies may be as important to the stability of the current government as it contributes to the protection of its theoretical and operational core (and thus the position and prerogatives of those with a hand in managing the state). [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 12:31 pm
ShareOn Wednesday, in Perez v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 4:01 am
Hell, Brown v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
UgandaUnwanted Witness-Uganda v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:37 am
The core problem with this approach, as we have explained in detail in other writings, most recently here, is that it would be completely inconsistent with the nature of post-Erie federal common law. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
From Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm
Heller (2008) and in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
” Monasky v. [read post]